Dear Mr Talerico,


One of my highest priorities if not my highest priority is to make sure my complaint at law acurately reflects what I am accusing the Popovich Law firm of doing. 

In this message I'd like to speak very directly about my experiences.  In the most direct, graphic and very real sense, from 2011 to 2015 I was repeatedly and systematically 'raped' by the Law Office of Thomas J. Popovich.  I have direct evidence of what they did to me, step by step, incident by incident.

If I can't have a complaint that accurately reflects what I now know the Popovich Law Office actually did to me, then I feel I am being choked or stifled in a very fundamental way.

If the Judge moves to not allow the following charges into the complaint and into the court record,  I can ony interpret this as a deliberate attempt to silence these accusations.  If that happens this case will be under appeal for that reason.

Considering what the Judge said about the tendency of the Appeals court to side against a trunkated discovery process, I have to conclude that an Appeals court will not rule against Dulberg being allowed to include the most serious accusations of what is essentially a systematic 'rape' of their own client.

Furthermore I fear that if nothing is entered into the record before the next court date, I risk the possibility of having what I consider to be the most serious evidence against the Law Office of Thomas J. Popovich not allowed in the complaint.  I've already risked my home for this case.  I cannot risk having what I believe to be the most damning evidence against Popovich excluded from my complaint against him.




It is also important for me to include a history of how many times I have asked my attorney to revise The instant complaint since first discovering what I considered to be a "smoking gun" in July, 2018.  I informed the Clinton Law Firm at that time in writing with a detailed description of why this newly found evidence proves conclusively that the Law Offices of Thomas J. Popovich intentionally undermined my case.  Julia never seemed interested.  Over a year later in a telephone interview on #####, just before the deposition of Mast, my brother mentioned the evidence again to both Julia and Ed Clinton and provided what he called 'overwhelming evidence' in writing and verbally of intent on the part of the Law Office of Thomas J. Popovich to undermine Dulberg's cases against both Gagnon and the McGuires.

The Clinton Law Firm never showed any interest in the evidence of intent even though they were in possession of it for well over a year and it was clearly described in writing in great detail by the client the whole time.

It is now 2022 and after having asked counsel for close to 4 years about amending or modifyng the instant complaint and always being told it is something that we will do later, I was now told for the first time that the Judge probably won't allow it.




Unlike the Law offices of Thomas J. Popovich, I have managed to keep my morality intact and I intend to keep doing so.  I am going to do so by insisting to the Judge in writing that the complaint reflect the reality of what they did to me.  If the Judge refuses my request I would like my argument for insisting written into the record clearly and in detail since this appears destined for an appeal.

In good conscience I cannot allow a Judge to deny my basic right to have my complaint reflect the detailed reality of what was done to me and for which I currently have extensive direct documented evidence.  If they do I have to unequivocably object in the clearest and most detailed and articulate way possible.



I want to finish the message by stating in clear terms how I feel my situation to be.  A Law firm in McHenry County has systematically and repeatedly raped me financially, physically, enotionally and spiritually from 2011 to 2015.  I am suing this law firm in McHenry County.  I have overwheming direct, documented evidence to prove my accusations.  The defense has been using a forged document for months and I have evidence that the document was forged by their client. 

Yet I am being told I cannot enter any of this newly found evidence of repeated and systematic financial and emotional rape into the complaint against the rapists?  If so, the court records clearly show that Attorney Flynn was allowed to use a forged document to delay the proceedings for months but I was not allowed to enter into the instant complaint that the document is a forgery.

If such clearly absurd decisions are allowed to be upheld, it should be obvious why I or anyone in my situation would understand this as a further continuation of the same systematic and repeated raping process and as a further violation of my fundamental right to lodge an accurate and detailed complaint against my rapists in a court of law.

If a McHenry County Judge blocks a request to place direct evidence of a McHenry County Law Firm repeatedly and systematically raping their own client for 4 years into the McHenry County record by a resident of the county, they are free to do so.  If Judge Meyer wishes to go on record with that decision, that is his life and his morality.  As for my life and my morality, I have no choice but to object to that in the clearest and most articulate way possible, on the record.